Sunday, 28 September 2025

Did Travancore Maharaja End Bharat's Oldest Rivalry?

Anyone familiar with the history of Kerala would recognize the three major kingdoms that shaped its political landscape: Travancore, Kozhikode, and Cochin. 

Travancore rose to prominence only in the early 18th century, following the military conquests of Maharaja Marthanda Varma. 

Conversely, the Zamorins of Kozhikode saw their power diminish towards the end of that century, largely due to the invasions of Hyder Ali. 

By contrast, the Kingdom of Cochin endured over centuries—surviving the ambitions of Marthanda Varma, the campaigns of Hyder Ali, and even the formidable advances of Tipu Sultan—thanks to the exceptional diplomatic acumen of its rulers. Yet, these were only some of the challenges Cochin overcame in its long history.

For centuries, Cochin (Perumpadappu Swaroopam) withstood repeated aggression from the Zamorins, who opposed its claims to overlordship in Kerala. Much like India as a whole, which historically refrained from wars of conquest, Cochin never sought to expand its territory through offensive campaigns. Instead, every conflict it engaged in was defensive—fought either to reclaim its own lands or to protect the rights of its subordinate chieftains.

The emergence of European influence in Kerala during the 16th and 17th centuries can be traced directly to the protracted rivalry between the Rajas of Cochin and the Zamorins of Kozhikode. This conflict, depending on the historical perspective one follows, spanned no less than eight to nine centuries, continuing well into the late 19th century. Remarkably, despite its longevity, neither side ever succeeded in eliminating the other.

It is intriguing to consider whether this centuries-old rivalry was finally eased in 1877 by the intervention of Maharaja Sri Ayilyam Thirunal Rama Varma of Travancore.

L: Raja of Cochin, Sri Rama Varma, posthumously known as Mithuna Masathil Theepetta Valiya Thampuran; R: Maharaja Sri Ayilyam Thirunal Rama Varma of Travancore


According to Sir Chettur Sankaran Nair’s autobiography, the Maharaja of Travancore may have played a pivotal role in facilitating dialogue between the rulers.

Sir Chettur Sankaran Nair, statesman and only Malayali to be President of Indian National Congress


What is certain from historical records is that there was no cordial meeting between the Zamorin and the Raja of Cochin for centuries. The first documented instance of such an encounter occurred only in July 1914, when Maharaja Sri Rajarshi Rama Varma of Cochin met with the Zamorin. 

July 1914 - Historic meeting of Samoothiri and Raja of Cochin Sri Rajarshi Rama Varma


If the account attributed to 1877 holds any truth, it may indeed represent the crucial “ice-breaker” that laid the foundation for this reconciliation, when Raja of Cochin, Sri Rama Varma, posthumously known as Mithuna Masathil Theepetta Valiya Thampuran met the then Samoothiri at the Marina Beach in Madras.

We should also understand that Cochin did not have cordial relationships with Travancore as well during the time.

Excerpt from Page 13 - AUTOBIOGRAPHY OF SIR SANKARAN NAIR

13. While a student in the College (1877), the Prince of Wales, afterwards King Edward VII, visited Madras. We boys lined both sides of the Mount Road. The Anglo Indian boys cheered him. We Hindu and Muslim boys had not learned how to cheerthen. We showed our regard for him by our respectful silence. The Maharajas of Cochin and Travancore had come to Madras to pay their respects to him. So also the Zamorin Maharaja Bahadur came here. The Zamorin and the Cochin Maharaja used to pass each other on the Marina without any recognition, as their ancestors were bitter enemies and generally fought each other in the Pre-British days. One day the Travancore Maharaja whose ancestors also were fighting them, but was an enlightened man, laughed at them and told them, “ Here we are come from our distant countries to run like menials behind the carriage of a Foreigner whose servants we are. What is the use then of assuming all these airs? Where is our dignity?"

This made them heartily ashamed of themselves. The Maharaja of Travancore took one to the other. And thereafter they showed to each other the civilities appropriate to their position. In those days they considered it beneath their dignity to return the calls of Indian visitors. Now what a change !

End!

Photo Credits:

Saturday, 27 September 2025

Dakshayani Velayudhan's speech at Indian Constituent Assembly

Prime Minister of India, Shri. NARENDRA MODI, on the occasion of India's independence day speech in 2025 took the name of Mrs. Dakshayani Velayudhan, one of the nine female members of INDIAN CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY and part of Constitutional drafting committee. Below is one of her first speech given in the Constituent Assembly, before Indian independence. 



PROCEEDINGS OF THE INDIAN CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY - DECEMBER 1946

Speech of Smt. Dakshayani Velayudhan, Member of Cochin Legislative Council and Representative to The Indian Constituent Assembly


Ninth Day — New Delhi — 19th December 1946


MRS. VELAYUDAN'S APPEAL TO DR. AMBEDKAR

Srimati Dakshayani Velayudan (Harijan representative) said that the emancipation of the Harijans lay in the national forces which were represented in the Assembly. She hoped that in the Independent India of the future, Harijans would have their honourable place like other citizens (cheers from members). In the Indian Republic there would be no barriers based on caste or community. "I visualise that the underdogs will be the rulers of the Indian Republic. I therefore, appeal to Harijan delegates that they should not harp on separatism. They should not make themselves the laughing stock of future generations.

Communalism, whether Harijan, Christian, Muslim or Sikh, is opposed to nationalism (hear. hear from members). The other day Mr. Churchill was very eloquent over the Harijans and said that the British Government is responsible for the lives of the so-called scheduled castes of India. But what has the British Government done to improve the social status of the Harijans? Did they ever pass any legislation to remove the social disabilities of the Harijans? Mr. Churchill may give protection to a few communalists who may fly to England but he must understand that Harijans are Indians and they have to live in India as Indians. What we want is the removal of the social disabilities. Only an independent Socialist India, India, not the British Government, can give freedom and equality of status to Harijans."

Some of the members of the Negotiating Committee, representing the Chamber of Princes, had objected to the statement in the resolution that power was derived from the people. But the historic message from the Cochin Maharaja to the people of Cochin State, "the most advanced State in India, to which I am proud to say I belong (cheers from members)," justified that statement. The Maharaja said in that message, "I believe in pure constitutional rule and throughout my life I have sedulously cultivated an attitude towards life and institutions which is antipathetic to autocracy and personal rule." It was obvious from this message that power was derived from the people.

The House at this stage adjourned till the 21st.