Wednesday, 12 October 2016

സരസ്വതി നമസ്തുഭ്യം...

ശ്രീ


വിജയദശമിയോടനുബന്ധിച്ചു കുറച്ചു സരസ്വതി സ്തോത്രങ്ങൾ ഇവിടെ പങ്കുവെക്കുന്നു...

പല പുസ്തകങ്ങളിൽ നിന്നും പിന്നെ മനോരമയിലെ ഈ പംക്തിയിൽ  നിന്നും സ്വരൂപിച്ചതാണ്.

സരസ്വതി നമസ്തുഭ്യം
വരദേ കാമരൂപിണീ
വിദ്യാരംഭം കരിഷ്യാമി
സിദ്ധിർ ഭവതുമേസദാ.

യാ കുന്ദേന്ദു തുഷാരഹാര ധവളാ
യാ ശുഭ്ര വസ്ത്രാവൃതാ
യാ വീണാ വരദണ്ഡമണ്ഡിതകരാ
യാ ശ്വേതപദ്മാസനാ
യാ ബ്രഹ്മാച്യുത ശങ്കര പ്രഭൃതിഭിഃ
ദേവൈസ്സദാ പൂജിതാ
സാ മാം പാതു സരസ്വതീ ഭഗവതീ
നിശ്ശേഷ ജാഡ്യാപഹാ

മാണിക്യവീണാമുപലാളയന്തിം
മദാലസാം മഞ്ജുള വാഗ്വിലാസാം
മാഹേന്ദ്ര നീലദ്യുതി കോമളാംഗിം
മാതംഗകന്യാം മനസാ സ്മരാമി

വാചാമീശ്വരി ഭക്തകല്പലതികേ
സർവ്വാർത്ഥസിദ്ധിപ്രദേ
ഗദ്യപ്രാകൃത പദ്യജാതരചനാ
സർവത്ര സിദ്ധിപ്രദേ
നീലേന്ദീവരലോചനത്രയയുതേ
കാരുണ്യവാരാന്നിധേ
സൗഭാഗ്യാമൃത വർഷണേന കൃപയാ
സിഞ്ചത്വമസ്മാദൃശം

ചതുർഭുജേ ചന്ദ്രകലാവതംസേ
കുചോന്നതേ കുങ്കുമരാഗശോണേ
പുണ്ഡ്രേഷുപാശാങ്കുശപുഷ്പബാണ-
ഹസ്തേ നമസ്തേ ജഗദേകമാതഃ

മാതാ മരതകശ്യാമാ  മാതംഗി മദശാലിനി
കടാക്ഷയതു കല്യാണി കദംബ വനവാസിനി
ജയ മാതംഗ തനയേ ജയ നീലോൽപലദ്യുതേ
ജയ സംഗീത രസികേ ജയ ലീലാ ശുകപ്രിയേ

മുദ്രാപുസ്തക ഹസ്താഭ്യാം
ഭദ്രാസന ഹൃദിസ്ഥിതേ
പുരസ്സരേ സദാ ദേവീം
സരസ്വതി നമോസ്തുതേ

സുരാസുരസേവിതപാദപങ്കജാ
കരേവിരാജത്കമനീയപുസ്തകാ
വിരിഞ്ചപത്നീ കമലാസനസ്ഥിതാ
സരസ്വതീ നൃത്യതു വാചിമേ സദാ

വെള്ളപ്പളുങ്കു നിറമൊത്ത വിദഗ്ദ്ധരൂപീ
കള്ളം കളഞ്ഞു കമലത്തിലെഴുന്ന ശക്തീ
വെള്ളത്തിലെത്തിരകൾ തള്ളിവരും കണക്കെ
എന്നുള്ളത്തിൽ വന്നു വിളയാടുക സരസ്വതീ നീ

വാണീദേവീ സുനീലവേണി സുഭഗേ വീണാരവം കൈതൊഴാം
വാണീവൈഭവാ മോഹിനീ ത്രിജഗതാം നാഥേ വിരിഞ്ജ പ്രിയേ
വാണീദോഷമശേഷമാശു  കളവാനെൻനാവിലാത്താദരം
വാണീടേണമതിന്നു നിന്നടിയിൽ ഞാൻ വീഴുന്നു മൂകാംബികേ

ഓം സം സരസ്വത്യൈ നമ:

Tuesday, 12 July 2016

Cochin Devasom Board and Seva Sangom – What’s happening?

ശ്രീ

With the recent developments and problems happening in Sree Poornathayeesha Temple, Tripunithura, I thought of going through 20 years of works conducted by Cochin Devasom Board (CDB), the current custodian of the temple and Sree Poornathrayeesha Seva Sangom, a trust created in late 1960’s to conduct Valiya Utsavom.

As a Slave (aTima) of Lord Poornathrayeesa and as a member of Cochin Royal Family, who handed over the temple to the Indian Dominion in 1949, I believe I have all rights to perform an analysis of CDB and Seva Sangom initiatives. All opinions detailed below are solely from my thoughts and analysis.

In past 20 years, Seva Sangom and CDB have made lot of modifications to the structure, procedures, processes and rituals of the temple, starting with Deva Prashnam. So, let me detail some of the changes that were done. Some of them has created an environment of concern for real devotees of Lord Sree Poornathrayeesha, and not to the power hungry, selfish, jealous and egoistic people. This is creating a situation similar to what happened in Vadakkumnathan Temple in 18th century and Peruvanam Mahakshetram before that.

Below, I will be just highlighting prime reasons on how I arrived at conclusions and leave a detailed report for some time in near future. Also, we should keep in mind that Devasom Officer (representative of CDB in the temple) is just another puppet (of late) in the hands of Seva Sangom (I have seen an incident in person to prove this), a body which could exist only as long as any construction happen in the temple, as per the judiciary of India.
  1. Sree Kovil (Sanctum Santorum) ceiling changed to wood -  To change the first concreate Sree Kovil in Kerala was an unnecessary waste of crores of rupees for nothing in return. Even though the reason mentioned was that there were some damages to the concreate (which could have been fixed by simple repairs), the primary reason to change from concreate ceiling to wood was the heat inside the Sanctum Santorum. After reconstruction, the concerned people who perform rituals inside the sanctum sanctorum have personally told me that the heat has just doubled. Also, not to mention the miscalculations and wrong construction (Dr. Ashalatha Thampuran’s detailed report on this) that was undertaken. I also wonder if someone has audited the accounts for this reconstruction, I will be surprised if there was an audit. My verdict – Unnecessary waste of money for nothing in return. Keeping this in mind, I would have a full audit of the works undertaken, clearly knowing that the current President of Seva Sangom is a Chartered Accountant. Not to mention the damages to the beliefs and rituals of the temple.
  2. Namaskara Mandapam ceiling changed to wood - Again, one of the first concrete Mandapam in Kerala. This reconstruction, as per my knowledge, was due to the wrong construction of Sreekovil. Even the reconstruction of Namaskara Mandapam has its flaws. The last I heard was that there are lot of leaks during rain and misappropriations in the design. My Verdict – Unnecessary and unwanted costs incurred upon the devotees for personal (in this case, an organisation) gains.
  3. New Gold Kolam for the god – An antique and archaeological item was destroyed by Seva Sangom and Devasom Board to build an ugly new one. This was such an unnecessary change. The beautiful old Kolam was so exquisitely created, which person with a good mind will try to destroy it and build an ugly new one. My Verdict – I was told in my childhood that the Golden Kolam had very precious stones. I hope they are still there in the new one. I would like someone perform audit on this.
  4. Golden Nettipattom – There was no need to do this and I am not saying much about this as the matter is\was in courts. My Verdict – Why do you need to change such a magnificent and glorious nettipattom? What is the logic? Cochin Devasom Board and Seva Sangom has to explain this. There was no damage to this centuries old antique. Is this just to erase all identities of Cochin Royal Family in the temple?
  5. Crown\Kireedom of Sree Poornathrayeesa – After Cochin Royal Family repaired the Kireedom of Sree Poornathrayeesha in 2005, in 2007 the weight of Kireedom was said to be 60 grams lesser that what was weighed in 2005. There were initial indications to blame the Cochin Royal Family for this, but the whole repair by Goldsmith happened inside the temple in presence of 2 officials from Cochin Devasom Board. What happened after that in those 2 years? Nobody knows. My Verdict – Cochin Devasom Board officials has to answer this and remove all doubts from the mind of devotees.
  6. Wrestled the possession of nearby land (oottupura parambu) from Government for temple use – This was a very good initiative from Seva Sangom. My Verdict – As long as the land is used for purpose of the temple and not for building a shopping complex, this is good.
  7. Sree Hari - Nothing to explain. My Verdict – Again, a complete eyewash on the devotees, with Seva Sangom collecting amount saying that Sree Poornathrayeesha needed an elephant for daily rituals. Now, Seva Sangom is collecting money which actually should have been going to the temple. Even though Seva Sangom could line up judgements, for me, this is a day light robbery of devotees.
  8. The Gold and other valuables missing from the vault\strong room – Cochin Devasom Board has to answer to the public and Cochin Royal Family about the missing valuables which was presented to Lord Sree Poornathrayeesha by devotees and erstwhile Cochin Royal Family. My Verdict - CDB has not done anything to clarify the doubts and concerns. Have the officials of the government body cheated the devotees? I clearly feel so.

The destruction of artefacts, antiques and history by CDB and Seva Sangom could be compared to ISIS destroying historical monuments in Syria. But here, these are friendly people are trying to remove traces of some great people and minds, who before them, had protected and modified a rich cultural heritage for centuries. I wish they don’t blow up the temple to see if there are some treasures buried underneath.

I feel it is time some of us thought about the covenant signed in 1949 by a certain noble heart in front of V.P Menon. The way the temple is being administered right now, I fear for the future.
With the paid media not highlighting such daylight robberies, I wish to say that I have changed my mind about the treasures of Sri Padmanabhaswamy temple. The treasure should stay inside the temple and should be under the supervision of Travancore Royal Family.

This reminds me of a prose from purushartha-koothu,

നന്നായ് വിളക്കു, തിരുനേദ്യഘൃതാഭിഷേകം.
കൂത്തോത്തു, പാട്ട്, തിരുവുത്സവമെന്നിതെല്ലാം
മാറ്റിക്കളഞ്ഞു നിജസന്തതിയെക്കെടുപ്പാ-
നൂരാളരെന്നു ചില രാക്ഷസർ സഞ്ചരന്തി.

Synopsis: The Owners of temples in Kerala usually decide on day to day affairs of the temple they own. Not only they do not perform any rituals for pleasing the gods, they also stop others from doing it. They have stopped the daily offerings (Lamps, Nivedyam, Neyyabhishekam, Koothu, Othu, Paattu, Utsavom etc.). There is no particular reason for this, just for destroying their lineage. They do things which Demons do, that is hurt Gods.

In this prose, the owner (CDB and Seva Sangom) of a temple is being compared to a Demon (രാക്ഷസർ).

Below is a prose which occurred to me.

സേവാസംഘമെന്നും ദേവസ്വമെന്നും നാമം
പക്ഷേ സ്വസ്‌സേവയും സ്വസ്സ്വവും പരിണാമം
അജയ്യനായ വിചാരിപ്പിനു നാവില്ല, മാങ്കായിൽ മന്നന് നാണമില്ല
സ്വേച്ഛക്കായ് നശിപ്പിക്കുന്നു, പൂർണ്ണവേദപുരാധീശ: പാഹി: പാഹി:

പാതു: പൂർണ്ണത്രയീശ:

Tuesday, 3 May 2016

I or WE? What should we use?

During an official discussion with a senior manager, when I used "WE" to describe achievements of an agile team of which I was the Manager or Leader, s/he told me to use "I" and told me to use "I did that, I did this", even if it was team effort.

It did not sink in well with me. This started a string of thoughts and doubts in my mind about my outlook and concept of Agile and Lean. Every decision the team made, everything we did, were collective and discussed.

So, the following questions came into my mind and tried answering it, sometimes with help of Yahoo!!! (McAfee Secure Search)

Is there something as "I" in Agile?

No, Agile should be a team effort. Agile manifesto states Individuals and Interactions over Processes and Tools. When a group of individuals interact, it becomes a team. It should be about people involved in the team, but not an individual person in the team. Everyone should work and help others in the team to do something better than yesterday. Every individual in the team should keep their ego and selfishness in check (It is difficult to eliminate both). This will help to improve trust and togetherness in the team.

When an Agile Team achieves a goal, who should claim the responsibility for success? The Team in public and The Manager in private?

This was the second question that came into my mind after the discussion. Should I be claiming the success individually in private and blame the shortcomings on my team, as I was the Manager or Leader of the team? I should not. Because, whatever I do as Manager or Leader, it is the team who do the work and the success and failure should be equally shared, both in private and public. Again, ego and selfishness comes into perspective here, as due to both, one could feel that the success of the team was because of you.

Should there be continuity and team spirit in Agile teams?

A long answer typed out for this question, but on a day when the so called “Tinkerman” helped his team achieve the most important success of their life yet, with the least tinkering, I erased that answer and put this in. Leicester City Football Club were crowned champions of the English Premier League. A team, with no stars, made up of rejects and minimal budget, has rose to the top in 9 months. What should be noted is that the “Tinkerman” did not tinker much with the team which performed “The Great Escape” last season, winning 7 out of 9 matches to avoid relegation, unlike other "Tinkerers". This helped the team to keep the spirit up and rest is history and self explanatory.
NOTE: I believe in and support YNWA

Should we celebrate every success, even if we deliver late?

This question came up as part of discussion. I still do not have a concrete answer to this question. My answer would be No, because the team should not celebrate failure. Late Delivery is No Delivery. I remember my eldest maternal uncle saying, “Newspaper delivered after 6.30 A.M. is a waste paper”. Even though it contains news, if you do not get it before you start your day, it is of no use. Over and unnecessary celebrations give a false sense of attainment which could affect future projects. What the team should understand are the factors behind delivering late and how to negate them in future. There should certainly be a high level of satisfaction within the team that the delivery was completed. We should definitely celebrate the true successes.

Did I get the whole concept of Agile wrong?

I am sure I did not, but I may be wrong. It is the group of individual people who matters in Agile, not an individual person, even if he is the Manager or Leader of the team. Success and failure in a team effort is always achieved as a team, not as individuals.

Final Thoughts

I read somewhere that an agile team could be like a failed communist state which made me remember my question to Pete Deemer in my Scrum Master certification class – “Is Scrum on the basis of Communist Ideology?”(where in every role contributes and collective decisions are made) and I got a No and a big smile from him. Agile Methodology is good and failure of agile will make a team look like a failed communist state, but that would surely be due to a Individualistic, egoistic and selfish person in the team.


I may be wrong as my thoughts could have been influenced by my bringing up. Growing up in a joint family, the values we (my elder brother and me) were taught were to adjust, share, enjoy everything with everyone. Never say “I” or “Mine”, unless it was a mistake or a misdeed, which you surely have to take responsibility for. If we did something good, sometimes we would just get a “good” and if we (especially my elder brother) made a mistake, all hell would break loose.

I believe these values helped me in my career as a software developer and a team player to keep myself self-motivated.