If a proven fraud or an Impostor starts a religious place of worship, would you go there?
If a proven fraud or an Impostor claims to be a saint, would you be their disciple or follower?
Well, I won't because I know their intentions are not good.
Please share this post if you think you have seen or know any fraud or imposter who has started a religious place of worship or has become Godmen.
But there are common people who, even after presented with credible evidence, follow these fake Godmen and go to the temples they have built.
These fakes are just after money of common people.
These Godmen market themselves to be unique, make themselves visually appealing, perform rituals that makes no sense and talk or do things that common people, who do not have a clue on religious practices, blindly believes.
They also market their temples to bring in more revenue, which in turn will increase their income, even if a Trust runs these temples.
These common people get attracted to these frauds and start pumping money to temples which makes no sense and performed in a visually appealing, but ritualistically wrong way.
Not only that, these Godmen bring well known personalities, priests and artists to perform in their temple and pay them the money they cheat from Common People.
These well known people, like Paanaavoor Thantri, Cherumukku Vaidikan, Kothamangalam Othikkan etc., have no regret in taking the so-earned money from these imposters.
With what these Godmen do, FOOLS BELIEVE in them and they will make the SCHOLARS to be in doubt as well.
In addition to this, non-Keralites are targeted for this mainly as they the traditions followed in Kerala is different from other parts of India and has created an aura among non-Malayalees. So, they are an easy target.
Recently, I had a chat with someone who follows the so called Ambotti Thampuran or the Manavendra Varma Yogathirippad, the well known cheat and imposter. Here is a summary (generated using AI) of the conversation I had with that person.
From the details we can say - Either that person is "Blind with Devotion" or "party to the heist". It seems the latter is more appropriate based on the person's involvement with the fraud recently, helping that person reach out to cheat unassuming people outside Kerala and even taking part in an event to translate the imposter's fake preachings.
FYI - This person wanted to have the above conversation with me about the fraud Ambotti Thampuran, not me.
AI GENERATED SUMMARY
Throughout the chat, the investigator (Vijay) confronts "Ambotti Thampuran Fool's Disciple" with repeated evidence and logical arguments pointing to manipulation and the fraud conducted by Fraud Ambotti Thampuran through his temple "Pulikkal Vishwa Nagayakshi temple" The investigator stresses accountability, highlighting that the use of "Fraud Ambotti Thampuran's" name on social platforms means direct responsibility for all actions, even when an attempt is made to claim that management is delegated. The responses from "Ambotti Fool's Disciple" are marked by spiritual rationalization, repeated distancing from criticism, and continual emphasis on faith and present-moment thinking, a defense that helps her deflect uncomfortable realities. Manipulative patterns attributed to "Fraud Ambotti Thampuran" include:Delegating public actions and decisions while keeping his name attached, thereby gathering both influence and plausible deniability.Maintaining a spiritual or metaphysical framing, making criticism seem like a personal or faith-based attack rather than a rational dispute.Relying on loyal followers, like "Ambotti Fool's Disciple", to spread messages, defend his character, and publicly deny direct wrongdoings, all while avoiding engagement with evidence of fraudulent behavior.Emotional shaming and guilt manipulation, such as claiming the investigator's behavior reflects poorly on their upbringing, which serves not only to silence dissent but to emotionally exhaust or discredit critics.Leveraging social and communal bonds—especially faith and ethnicity—as shields against outside critique and to keep followers aligned regardless of mounting evidence.Within this pattern, "Ambotti Fool's Disciple" appears emotionally invested and, in spite of logical counterarguments and explicit evidentiary references, reverts to mantra-like statements ("I live in the present," "He does not cheat me," "It's spiritual") and avoids confrontation with specific facts.The dynamic, thus exposes the core of Fraud Ambotti Thampuran's influence: creating layers of emotional, spiritual, and communal loyalty, enabling him to manipulate group perceptions and evade accountability.His supporters, epitomized in "Ambotti Fool's Disciple", become not only defenders but also indirect enforcers of his narrative, resisting critical thinking and reinforcing groupthink. Attempts to break this cycle are consistently met with diversion, dismissal, or emotional counterattack—hallmarks of manipulative environments.In essence, the conversation illustrates how "Fraud Ambotti Thampuran" leverages spiritual and psychological manipulation, and how dedicated followers like "Ambotti Fool's Disciple" are drawn into rationalizing and defending his actions, sometimes against their own better judgment or presented facts.
END.
